Thanks Gods, it was exactly the situations of personal photographs or those from a photographer/stock agency that I was referring to. I don't have a problem with magazine scans, many of these publications are long out of print and the channels to try and contact who might be able to give permission are so convoluted...anyway so many people scan those items that for them to go after one or a few individuals wouldn't be worth their effort, I don't think.
I think it is rather presumptuous of someone to scan a magazine pic and then claim some sort of right to it, don't get that at all, find it rather funny actually.
I have a few pics I've found that I kind of go "um, er...well" but if someone objects, I'll simply apologize and delete it. But it's nice to see these pics, usually you can't see them any other way because whatever is published in a magazine tends to make the rounds of all the magazines.
I'm babbling. I'll stop. LOL Thank you again.