Poisoned_Apathy wrote: but what I know is that an Olympic Games shouldn't be a place for politics...I mean, those people have been training their whole lifes just to be there, I think there are better places to make politic reivindications, and I think it's quite hypocrital that nobody has cared a d*mn thing about the human rights and the Tibet issues until a few months before the Games, so...
I have mixed feelings about China, too, but I don't think it's possible to separate the Olympics and politics. After all, it was for political reasons that the Chinese government wanted to stage the Games in the first place - to present their country as a modern, first world power which has gained acceptance and approval from other nations. I don't think you can say that's perfectly OK, but individual human rights protesters are wrong to "drag politics into the Olympics".
Having said that, I think there is an irony about George Bush (whose government endorsed extraordinary rendition, the waterboarding of terror suspects and detention withoput trial at Guantanamo Bay) lecturing the Chinese on human rights.
And there's a beautiful poignancy when sportspeople do rise above politics - demonsrated most powerfully today by the Georgian and Russian shooting medallists embracing on the podium.