Bridget wrote:Dear Gods,
Thanks a lot for that!!!
I thought I had switched off my flash but...it was still on...
When he took that little megaphone, I thought he was gonna say:
Hey, you! Switch off that flash or I'm gonna throw you out!
godisinthesilences wrote:thanks chris... that will be so appreciated.
I would think up on stage those little red lights would be very distracting. that is why i shoot with a film camera... no lights at all . I'm talking a real film camera not the newer auto/manual ones.
I am soooo looking forward to your photos and you sharing them with us. Thank you so much
MoodyB wrote:godisinthesilences wrote:thanks chris... that will be so appreciated.
I would think up on stage those little red lights would be very distracting. that is why i shoot with a film camera... no lights at all . I'm talking a real film camera not the newer auto/manual ones.
I am soooo looking forward to your photos and you sharing them with us. Thank you so much
Ahh an old school shooter like myself!
I have been wrestling with myself on this one, but I think I'm still going to shoot film...Digital still doesn't have the same tonal scale and texture as film.
A lot of people are shocked when they see my equipment, but I still love my oldies...My favourite is still my 1955 Rollei TLR, it turns out images that digital could never equal!
Anyhoo, I digress!
I'll do my best with the images, everyone loved the ones I did in Chicago, the photo of Keith Lowe on David's (& Keith's ) website was taken during that shoot and happens to be Keith's favourite photo of himself!
All the best,
Chris
x
Silver Moon wrote:Hey Chris!
I'm highly looking forward to your photos. I love the ones you've taken so far!!
And Gods... Thanks for the tips!
-K-
godisinthesilences wrote:MoodyB wrote:godisinthesilences wrote:thanks chris... that will be so appreciated.
I would think up on stage those little red lights would be very distracting. that is why i shoot with a film camera... no lights at all . I'm talking a real film camera not the newer auto/manual ones.
I am soooo looking forward to your photos and you sharing them with us. Thank you so much
Ahh an old school shooter like myself!
I have been wrestling with myself on this one, but I think I'm still going to shoot film...Digital still doesn't have the same tonal scale and texture as film.
A lot of people are shocked when they see my equipment, but I still love my oldies...My favourite is still my 1955 Rollei TLR, it turns out images that digital could never equal!
Anyhoo, I digress!
I'll do my best with the images, everyone loved the ones I did in Chicago, the photo of Keith Lowe on David's (& Keith's ) website was taken during that shoot and happens to be Keith's favourite photo of himself!
All the best,
Chris
x
Oh yes I'm an old schooler for sure. I agree 100% with you about film vs. digital. The tonal scale and colour quality is still not there. I notice it especially in reds and skin tones. Two very important colours for me to get right in my line of work. Many of my favourite films however have been discontinued. Like Agfa 100 speed black and white ... god just THE best black and white for studio work.
My favourite camera to use is my Pentax 6x7. However recently I've been having an affair with an old Speedgraphic 4x5. Not exactly the best for concerts though LOL. When I shoot shows I always use my Nikon F3 28-85lens and 100 speed film. David would be proud of me LOL (kidding).
Anyway... if you ever wanna talk photography drop me a line. It is what I do after all
MoodyB wrote:BTW,
I just received confirmation from Richard Chadwick on my pass for the Conegliano show! Woot!
Only thing is, David is only allowing photography during the first two songs.
On the bright side, I will be able to sit back and enjoy the rest of the concert,
but I will have to shoot like the dickens during those two songs!
Chris
x
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests