by camphorvan on Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:30 am
Just thought I'd add my tuppence worth here;
For myself, I would imagine that those musicians or otherwise have been credited for helping to write the songs, whether their musical contribution made the final cut or not. I can understand the question, because the credits don't necessarily match with the musical contributors on each track, but to suggest there is some underhand motive at work I think is a step too far. The creation of the music (no I won't pretentiously call it 'the work') is in a sense, none of our damn business anyway - we get the product, the final article. When directors make a movie or produce a play, do we feel it's our business to question the creation of it? No. We, as an audience get to see the result of the blood, sweat and tears, not the blood, sweat and tears themselves. It is the function of a 'record' for it to be listened to. Maybe, though, the function of the DVD is to allow us into the world of the recording process, as an audience. So, I think waiting and not judging might be a good idea, as opposed to leaping to conclusions.
cv